- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Fri, 05 Sep 2014 16:50:20 +0200
- To: Robin Berjon <robin@w3.org>, Paul Cotton <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>, "public-html-admin@w3.org" <public-html-admin@w3.org>
On 2014-09-05 15:52, Robin Berjon wrote: > On 02/09/2014 07:26 , Julian Reschke wrote: >> I believe bug <https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=26165> >> represents a problem with respect to advancing the spec. > > I beg to differ. > > Do you have new information that would change the situation described in > the bug and which was flagged for processing in the future? Well, I reported the issue, you flagged it as "later" (and as far as I can tell agreed this is a problem). It seems the only disagreement is whether this is serious enough to block a transition to proposed recommendation. I feel it is (*), but I'm not a W3C process expert. Best regards, Julian (*) Essentially we have a MUST requirement to implement an algorithm that is known to be incorrect.
Received on Friday, 5 September 2014 14:50:59 UTC