W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html-admin@w3.org > October 2014

Re: clarification sought on publishing alt text document as a WG note

From: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
Date: Wed, 08 Oct 2014 19:09:31 -0400
Message-ID: <5435C42B.2010409@intertwingly.net>
To: Steve Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com>, HTML Accessibility Task Force <public-html-a11y@w3.org>, "public-html-admin@w3.org" <public-html-admin@w3.org>, "Michael[tm] Smith" <mike@w3.org>, Philippe Le Hégaret <plh@w3.org>
On 10/08/2014 06:09 PM, Janina Sajka wrote:
> Sam Ruby writes:
>> On 10/08/2014 03:57 PM, Janina Sajka wrote:
>>>
>>> The process did not fail. You've simply forgotten the PF componant in
>>> the process. Without it, the HTML-WG cannot proceed.
>>
>> Point of clarification: this is not a document that is produced jointly with
>> PFWG, nor is this document owned by this task force.  See, for example, the
>> third bullet in the "Accessibility Task Force" section of "Plan 2014"[1].
>>
>> At the current time, the HTML WG chairs are aware of concerns expressed by
>> members of the PF, and have decided to give PFWG an opportunity to make a
>> proposal on how to proceed.  Any such proposal would need to go to the HTML
>> WG.
>
> I suppose it depends on the definition of "responsibility" in that
> bullet point? There's a much clearer statement also the list of deliverables in the HTML-A`11Y TF
> Work Statement, which was approved by the HTML-WG:
>
> http://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/html-task-force

I stand corrected.  See:

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-admin/2013Oct/0110.html

> Janina

- Sam Ruby
Received on Wednesday, 8 October 2014 23:10:22 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:37:36 UTC