- From: Paul Cotton <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>
- Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2014 17:36:08 +0000
- To: David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk>, Philippe Le Hegaret <plh@w3.org>
- CC: "public-html-admin@w3.org" <public-html-admin@w3.org>
> does the note have to be a copy of the spec or can it _just_ say the spec is not being progressed and link to the previous draft. You should prepare an Editor's draft of a WG Note contains the kind of "health warning" in Philippe's example Status of this Document. When you have this please provide me with the link. We will then use that Editor's draft to do a CfC in the WG to publish the WG Note. /paulc Paul Cotton, Microsoft Canada 17 Eleanor Drive, Ottawa, Ontario K2E 6A3 Tel: (425) 705-9596 Fax: (425) 936-7329 -----Original Message----- From: David Carlisle [mailto:davidc@nag.co.uk] Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2014 12:27 PM To: Philippe Le Hegaret; Paul Cotton Cc: public-html-admin@w3.org Subject: Re: Future of public Identifiers for entity resolution in XHTML On 12/11/2014 17:22, Philippe Le Hegaret wrote: > Usually, the Group would publish a Note explaining that the document > got withdrawn. OK I'll do that does the note have to be a copy of the spec or can it _just_ say the spec is not being progressed and link to the previous draft. David
Received on Wednesday, 12 November 2014 17:36:37 UTC