W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html-admin@w3.org > July 2014

WG Decision: return DOM4 to Last Call

From: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
Date: Thu, 03 Jul 2014 12:16:33 -0400
Message-ID: <53B581E1.7090304@intertwingly.net>
To: Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com>
CC: "public-html-admin@w3.org" <public-html-admin@w3.org>
As we got no objections, only indications of support, this CfC passes.

We did get one question, below.  This matter was previously brought up 
in the following bug request:


The editors feel this matter is resolved, but if anybody feels 
differently they are welcome to reopen this bug.

- Sam Ruby

On 06/25/2014 12:17 PM, Shane McCarron wrote:
> +1.
> But a question.  This document has language in it that, when I read
> earlier drafts, I assumed was there for editorial purposes and would be
> removed before PR.  Things like "Replace instances of DOMError with
> DOMException as DOMError will be nuked from orbit soon." seem needlessly
> idiomatic.  Don't get me wrong - I think it is funny, and the meaning is
> clear to me.  It may not be as clear to a non-native English speaker.
>   Is there a plan to rephrase these to be more formal?
> On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 7:06 PM, Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net
> <mailto:rubys@intertwingly.net>> wrote:
>     The HTML Chairs are issuing a Call for Consensus to return DOM4 to
>     Last Call.  The document can be found here:
>     http://w3c.github.io/dom/LC-__20140626.html
>     <http://w3c.github.io/dom/LC-20140626.html>
>     Silence will be taken to mean there is no objection, but positive
>     responses are encouraged. If there are no objections by Wednesday
>     July 2nd, this resolution will carry.
>     The proposed Last Call Working Draft states:
>           Since this document has already been through the Candidate
>           Recommendation stage, the Working Group expects to advance it to
>           Proposed Recommendation at the end of this Last Call period.
>     A list of bugs received during the CR phase, as well as their
>     resolution, can be found here:
>     http://tinyurl.com/ky4har3
>     Additionally, Document.origin as well as features previously listed
>     as at risk[1] have been removed.
>     - Sam Ruby,
>     on behalf of the HTML WG co-chairs
>     [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2014/CR-__dom-20140508/#h2_sotd12
>     <http://www.w3.org/TR/2014/CR-dom-20140508/#h2_sotd12>
Received on Thursday, 3 July 2014 16:17:01 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:37:36 UTC