Re: Public Warning - Discussion Guidelines

On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 6:12 AM, Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net> wrote:
> A number of individuals either do not understand or do not accept that the
> Director has ruled EME as in scope.  The Director has not reconfirmed that

I think you mean "The Director has *now* reconfirmed..." ;-)

Silvia.


> decision[1].  Any responses that question this ruling will not be considered
> when evaluating the EME heartbeat CfC.  If you object to the Director's
> ruling, please take it up with the Director.
>
> Additionally, a number of responses included words such as 'deceit'[2], and
> 'double speaking pursuing your dark objectives'[3].  These responses are not
> consistent with the Discussion guidelines[4].
>
> This email will serve as a final public warning for Mhyst and Fred.  Any
> subsequent emails containing terms such as these will result in immediate
> loss of posting privileges to the HTML WG mailing lists.
>
> - Sam Ruby
>
> [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-admin/2013Sep/0129.html
> [2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-admin/2013Sep/0114.html
> [3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-admin/2013Sep/0130.html
> [4] http://www.w3.org/html/wg/wiki/DiscussionGuidelines
>

Received on Monday, 30 September 2013 20:29:25 UTC