W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html-admin@w3.org > May 2013

Re: Working Group Decision to publish Encrypted Media Extensions specification as a First Public Working Draft (FPWD)

From: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
Date: Fri, 10 May 2013 06:53:40 -0400
Message-ID: <518CD1B4.8030704@intertwingly.net>
To: Andreas Kuckartz <A.Kuckartz@ping.de>
CC: public-html-admin@w3.org
On 05/10/2013 12:48 AM, Andreas Kuckartz wrote:
> Sam Ruby:
>> If anyone strongly disagrees with the content of the decision and would
>> like to raise a Formal Objection[5], they may do so at this time. Formal
>> Objections are reviewed by the Director in consultation with the Team.
> How much time is there to raise a Formal Objection?

It depends on what you want to accomplish.

The purpose of a First Public Working Draft is to seek wider review[1] 
and to start the clock on requiring disclosure of essential patent 

Unless your objections are to either of these two occurring, I'd suggest 
focusing near term on Jeff's suggestions[3], and longer term on Last 
Call[4] as ordinarily that would be when such Formal Objections are 
forwarded on for consideration.

Meanwhile, all active Formal Objections will be recorded here:


> Cheers,
> Andreas

- Sam Ruby

[1] http://www.w3.org/2005/10/Process-20051014/tr#first-wd
[2] http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Patent-Policy-20040205/#sec-exclusion-with
[3] http://www.w3.org/QA/2013/05/perspectives_on_encrypted_medi.html
[4] http://www.w3.org/2005/10/Process-20051014/tr#last-call
Received on Friday, 10 May 2013 10:54:30 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:37:33 UTC