W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html-admin@w3.org > January 2013

[Bug 20793] New: Is 'aside' related to the nearest ancestor sectioning content?

From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2013 11:30:10 +0000
To: public-html-admin@w3.org
Message-ID: <bug-20793-2495@http.www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/>
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=20793

            Bug ID: 20793
           Summary: Is 'aside' related to the nearest ancestor sectioning
                    content?
    Classification: Unclassified
           Product: HTML WG
           Version: unspecified
          Hardware: All
                OS: All
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: HTML5 spec
          Assignee: dave.null@w3.org
          Reporter: res-html@untief.org
        QA Contact: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
                CC: mike@w3.org, public-html-admin@w3.org,
                    public-html-wg-issue-tracking@w3.org

For the 'aside' element the spec says [1]:

  The aside element represents a section of a page that consists of content
that is tangentially related to the content around the aside element, and which
could be considered separate from that content.

Does "around" refer to content of the parenting sectioning element/root, to
content of the parenting element (no matter which) or to any content (whole
document)? Maybe it could be stated more clearly?

Further it says:

  The element can be used […] for other content that is considered separate
from the main content of the page.

Shouldn't it say something like "separate from the main content of the nearest
ancestor sectioning content"?



[1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/CR-html5-20121217/sections.html#the-aside-element

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Received on Monday, 28 January 2013 11:30:12 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 28 January 2013 11:30:12 GMT