RE: Oppose DRM ! Re: CfC: to publish Encrypted Media Extensions specification as a First Public Working Draft (FPWD)

On Fri, 25 Jan 2013, John Foliot wrote:

>
> Thus, I again ask that those who have objections to the proposed 
> Encrypted Media Extension specification limit them to specific technical 
> problems with the current draft under discussion (and I note that some 
> useful dialog has emerged from, among others, Robert O'Callahan), or, 
> barring that, take the use-case requirement and create an alternative 
> solution which can be brought forward as an alternative Extension Spec 
> for consideration.
>

Leaving aside the rest of your mail (which I'm sure someone else can reply 
to better than I), are you saying that we should not be allowed to decide 
if a proposal is appropriate in scope or material (or something else 
similar) for the working group?  That seems to go against a lot of how I 
understood this to work.