W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html-admin@w3.org > January 2013

Re: CfC: handle ISSUE-207 responsive-images consistently with Plan 2014

From: Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2013 09:31:10 +1100
Message-ID: <CAHp8n2k5yJ6gdqR8torm=9Oku1RmXwPMN6b6BHzFTbPFW2FGTQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Steve Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com>
Cc: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>, "public-html-admin@w3.org" <public-html-admin@w3.org>
I also support handling all responsive image proposals the same way as an
extension spec.

In addition, I'd like to see a discussion by browser vendors and Web
developers about their issues with either of these specs.

Cheers,
Silvia.

On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 2:06 AM, Steve Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com>wrote:

> I support the CFC
>
> regards
> SteveF
>
>
> On 16 January 2013 09:04, Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> Based on a tracker request in <
>> https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=18384>, we have an issue
>> raised regarding responsive images, and a request to incorporate a
>> responsive image solution into HTML5 as soon as possible, rather than
>> proceeding via extension specs:
>> https://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/207>.
>>
>> It seems that many in the Working Group have been satisfied to handle
>> responsive images consistently with Plan 2014, by proceeding via extension
>> specifications for possible later reintegration. Previously, the Working
>> Group decided to handle many existing open issues in this way: <
>> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2012Oct/0026.html>
>>
>> At this time, the Chairs propose to decide by consensus to address the
>> new ISSUE-207 responsive-images in the same way: by allowing extension
>> specifications to proceed (as they already are) and by allowing an
>> opportunity for future reintegration if the extensions can meet the HTML5
>> exit criteria.
>>
>> If you have any comments or concerns about this CfC, please respond by
>> Wednesday, January 23rd, 2013. Positive response is preferred and
>> encouraged and silence will be considered as agreement with the proposal.
>>
>> If your comment is an objection, please clearly state that. In accordance
>> with the W3C Process, objections SHOULD cite substantive arguments and
>> propose changes that would remove the objection.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Maciej
>> (on behalf of the HTML WG chairs)
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> with regards
>
> Steve Faulkner
> Technical Director - TPG
>
> www.paciellogroup.com | www.HTML5accessibility.com |
> www.twitter.com/stevefaulkner
> HTML5: Techniques for providing useful text alternatives -
> dev.w3.org/html5/alt-techniques/
> Web Accessibility Toolbar - www.paciellogroup.com/resources/wat-ie-about.html
>
>
Received on Wednesday, 16 January 2013 22:31:57 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 16 January 2013 22:31:59 GMT