Re: Proposed Disposition of Tracker Items

Hi Sam,

what do you want me to do with these?

the alt techniques doc covers both of these:

for https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=9216  there is
http://dev.w3.org/html5/alt-techniques/#sec13

for https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=9215 there is
http://dev.w3.org/html5/alt-techniques/#sec10

I am assuming you mean that we resolve them by proposing to add these to
HTML5?

regards
Steve

On 9 January 2013 16:00, Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net> wrote:

>
> http://w3.org/Bugs/Public/**buglist.cgi?product=HTML+WG&**
> keywords=TrackerRequest<http://w3.org/Bugs/Public/buglist.cgi?product=HTML+WG&keywords=TrackerRequest>
>
> Looking at these bugs, I divided them into three buckets:
>
>   1) Alt techniques bugs that should be assigned to Steve and resolved
>      as a part of that dialog.
>        https://www.w3.org/Bugs/**Public/show_bug.cgi?id=9215<https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=9215>
>        https://www.w3.org/Bugs/**Public/show_bug.cgi?id=9216<https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=9216>
>
>   2) Normative status bugs that should be resolved by preference polls:
>        https://www.w3.org/Bugs/**Public/show_bug.cgi?id=12725<https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=12725>
>        https://www.w3.org/Bugs/**Public/show_bug.cgi?id=12726<https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=12726>
>        https://www.w3.org/Bugs/**Public/show_bug.cgi?id=20082<https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=20082>
>
>   3) Bugs resolved by Ian but should be reopened (for 5.1) in order to
>      get our new editor team to take a position on the matter:
>        https://www.w3.org/Bugs/**Public/show_bug.cgi?id=13409<https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=13409>
>        https://www.w3.org/Bugs/**Public/show_bug.cgi?id=15213<https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=15213>
>        https://www.w3.org/Bugs/**Public/show_bug.cgi?id=18384<https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=18384>
>
> Note: for the bugs in the third bucket, it should still be possible for
> the function to be included in HTML 5.0, should an extension spec be
> written and progress by made towards satisfying the exit criteria:
>
> http://dev.w3.org/html5/**decision-policy/decision-**
> policy-v3.html#cr-integration<http://dev.w3.org/html5/decision-policy/decision-policy-v3.html#cr-integration>
>
> - Sam Ruby
>
>
>
>
>
<http://www.paciellogroup.com/resources/wat-ie-about.html>