Re: CfC: to publish Encrypted Media Extensions specification as a First Public Working Draft (FPWD)

simple answer: public-html-media


On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 11:43 AM, Mark Watson <watsonm@netflix.com> wrote:

>
>  On Feb 10, 2013, at 9:55 PM, Robert O'Callahan wrote:
>
>  Sam Ruby wrote:
>
>> Examining the objections related to the question as to whether the
>> candidate FPWD contains enough information to be implemented
>> interoperably, the chairs found that much of the input on this has
>> lacked specifics, so at this time we are putting out a call for clear
>> and specific bug reports to be filed against the Encrypted Media
>> Extensions component in bugzilla[1] by February 15th.  Once that is
>> complete, we will seek an recommendation by the EME editors on how to
>> proceed with these bugs.
>>
>
> I'm not sure that taking discussion off-list into a bug is a good idea,
> but I filed https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=20944 as
> requested. If it's not clear and specific enough, please explain why so I
> can fix it.
>
> There may be some questions/objections regarding the bug. Should I
> preemptively address them in the bug, or in an email, or will there be a
> chance to address them when/if they are made by the EME editors?
>
>
>  I'm confused about where we should take discussion of Robert's bug ? In
> the bug, on this list or on public-html-media ? Sorry if I missed this
> information in the fog today.
>
>  …Mark
>
>
> Thanks,
> Rob
> --
> Wrfhf pnyyrq gurz gbtrgure naq fnvq, “Lbh xabj gung gur ehyref bs gur
> Tragvyrf ybeq vg bire gurz, naq gurve uvtu bssvpvnyf rkrepvfr nhgubevgl
> bire gurz. Abg fb jvgu lbh. Vafgrnq, jubrire jnagf gb orpbzr terng nzbat
> lbh zhfg or lbhe freinag, naq jubrire jnagf gb or svefg zhfg or lbhe fynir
> — whfg nf gur Fba bs Zna qvq abg pbzr gb or freirq, ohg gb freir, naq gb
> tvir uvf yvsr nf n enafbz sbe znal.” [Znggurj 20:25-28]
>
>
>