W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html-admin@w3.org > February 2013

Re: CfC: to publish "The picture element" specification as a First Public Working Draft (FPWD)

From: Charles McCathie Nevile <chaals@yandex-team.ru>
Date: Fri, 08 Feb 2013 15:22:36 +0100
To: "Marcos Caceres" <w3c@marcosc.com>, "Robin Berjon" <robin@w3.org>
Cc: "Bruce Lawson" <brucel@opera.com>, public-html-admin@w3.org
Message-ID: <op.wr6x7yccy3oazb@chaals.local>
On Mon, 04 Feb 2013 15:32:20 +0100, Robin Berjon <robin@w3.org> wrote:

> On 04/02/2013 13:45 , Marcos Caceres wrote:
>> Correct. The problem is adding srcset to <source> because the
>> attribute then it becomes <picture> specific (i.e.,
>> <video|audio><source srcset> is meaningless, and may be confusing
>> because it works in one context (picture) but not others
>> (video|audio)). I don't like that personally, unless we are going to
>> make a case for responsive video and responsive audio:)
>
> Well, you know... it might not be that daft.

Responsive video seems rather less than daft. Why else would video sites  
go to the trouble of building UI and enabling multiple formats (which they  
have quite possibly gone to the trouble of generating and storing, too)?

Responsive audio is something where I see similar user cases, but fewer  
variables meaning it isn't a high priority on its own...

cheers

-- 
Charles McCathie Nevile - Consultant (web standards) CTO Office, Yandex
       chaals@yandex-team.ru         Find more at http://yandex.com
Received on Friday, 8 February 2013 14:23:14 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 8 February 2013 14:23:15 GMT