- From: Paul Cotton <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>
- Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2013 06:44:53 +0000
- To: "public-html-admin@w3.org" <public-html-admin@w3.org>
- CC: Eliot Graff <Eliot.Graff@microsoft.com>, Leif Halvard Silli (xn--mlform-iua@målform.no) <xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no>
The Polyglot Note vs Recommendation Track preference poll has indicated that the HTML WG prefers to keep the Polyglot specification on the Recommendation Track by a vote of 21-19-1-1: https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/40318/polyglot-status-preference-poll/results *** Decision of the Working Group *** Therefore, the HTML Working Group hereby adopts the position to keep the Polyglot specification on the Recommendation track: http://www.w3.org/html/wg/wiki/index.php?title=PolyglotRecommendationRationale&oldid=14090 Of the two positions before us, this one has drawn more support in the preference poll. == Next Steps == Bug 12725 status will be changed to RESOLVED WONTFIX and marked as WGDecision. https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=12725 The Editors are asked to prepare a new Polyglot Last Call Working Draft and to submit the candidate LC WD to the Chairs so that we can do a CfC on publishing the LC WD. The Chairs propose that this Last Call be scheduled to last 6 weeks from its publication date. == Appealing this Decision == If anyone strongly disagrees with the content of the decision and would like to raise a Formal Objection, they may do so at this time. Formal Objections are reviewed by the Director in consultation with the Team. Ordinarily, Formal Objections are only reviewed as part of a transition request. == Revisiting this Issue == This issue can be reopened if new information is presented. /paulc HTML WG co-chair Paul Cotton, Microsoft Canada 17 Eleanor Drive, Ottawa, Ontario K2E 6A3 Tel: (425) 705-9596 Fax: (425) 936-7329
Received on Wednesday, 11 December 2013 06:45:22 UTC