W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html-admin@w3.org > April 2013

RE: Formal objection to the marking of bug 21727 as invalid.

From: Fred Andrews <fredandw@live.com>
Date: Sun, 21 Apr 2013 22:44:15 +0000
Message-ID: <BLU156-W6426316F700FFBB2383CB0AACA0@phx.gbl>
To: Marcos Caceres <w3c@marcosc.com>
CC: "public-html-admin@w3.org" <public-html-admin@w3.org>, "public-html-media@w3.org" <public-html-media@w3.org>

Thank you for the suggestions.  Please note that my intention is not to 'shame'.
I have no animosity towards Glenn and wish him well.  Please accept that I receive
many insulting or inappropriate emails, and if it were my intention to 'shame'
people then I would have published them.  The Chair was made aware of the history
before this email was written.  Can I please ask everyone to leave it at that
and to direct any comments to the ideas within the message.

This email was forwarded because it is a response to business of the working
group and represents 'likely' actions that a 'group' will take that would damage
my interests.  Further, it appears to communicate matters that might
suggest a process failure.

cheers
Fred

> Date: Sun, 21 Apr 2013 14:50:34 +0100
> From: w3c@marcosc.com
> To: fredandw@live.com
> CC: public-html-admin@w3.org; public-html-media@w3.org
> Subject: Re: Formal objection to the marking of bug 21727 as invalid.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On Sunday, April 21, 2013 at 3:10 AM, David Singer wrote:
> 
> >  
> > On Apr 21, 2013, at 11:04 , Fred Andrews <fredandw@live.com (mailto:fredandw@live.com)> wrote:
> > >  
> > > I forward this unwelcome threat.  
> >  
> > Fred
> >  
> > it's really poor form to forward private emails to the list. It's also poor form to take friendly advice as a threat. Glenn is in no position to threaten you; he is observing how annoying you are, and trying to alert you to the fact that you are not coming over well. Far from threatening, this is a collegial and friendly move.
> While I tend to agree that Fred is barking up the wrong tree (and not really helping his case here) - Glenn is being a complete [insert favorite swear word here] for saying things like: "The fact that a few individuals such as yourself oppose EME is of little consequence."  
> 
> Nearly 14,000 people and growing have signed a petition opposing this move by the W3C:  
> 
> http://www.defectivebydesign.org/no-drm-in-html5
> 
> I wouldn't consider those "a few".   
> 
> Anyway… Fred, if people like Glenn do send you threatening private emails, by all means publish them publicly to shame them (as it's quite disgusting what Glenn wrote to you and he certainly deserves to be shamed publicly for being an [insert favorite swear word here]). But please don't do it here - instead, fwd the email to defectivebydesign.org (http://www.defectivebydesign.org/no-drm-in-html5), the IETF, or other organizations that are trying to fight DRM on the Web - or write them in blog post.  
> 
> Hope that helps!  
>   
> 
> 
> 
 		 	   		  
Received on Sunday, 21 April 2013 22:44:44 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:37:33 UTC