- From: Liam R E Quin <liam@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2015 23:23:47 -0500
- To: Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com>
- Cc: Janina Sajka <janina@rednote.net>, HTML Accessibility Task Force <public-html-a11y@w3.org>
On Fri, 30 Jan 2015 08:14:07 -0600 Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com> wrote: > I personally would prefer the Wiki so we can more readily keep it up to > date. Me too, as then others can update it -- as Charles pointed out, I'm only 10% time on accessibility. I don't mind doing it, but having information duplicated means it'll get out of sync over time. So one place is better. Is the wiki OK for *reading* from an accessibility point of view? -- Liam Quin - XML Activity Lead, W3C, http://www.w3.org/People/Quin/ Pictures from old books: http://fromoldbooks.org/
Received on Tuesday, 3 February 2015 04:23:51 UTC