W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html-a11y@w3.org > November 2014

Re: canvas, TPAC, and CR testing

From: Rik Cabanier <cabanier@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2014 09:48:43 -0800
Message-ID: <CAGN7qDArHsCs42Zc76qLjiPp8Qqeq9kkv_23A=1dxCicYuhzLA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Mark Sadecki <mark.sadecki@gmail.com>
Cc: Chaals from Yandex <chaals@yandex-team.ru>, Richard Schwerdtfeger <schwer@us.ibm.com>, "Sam Ruby (rubys@intertwingly.net)" <rubys@intertwingly.net>, Mark Sadecki <mark@w3.org>, Canvas <public-canvas-api@w3.org>, "W3C WAI Protocols & Formats" <public-pfwg@w3.org>, Jay Munro <jaymunro@microsoft.com>, HTML Accessibility Task Force <public-html-a11y@w3.org>
On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 12:22 PM, Mark Sadecki <mark.sadecki@gmail.com>

> On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 7:55 AM, <chaals@yandex-team.ru> wrote:
>> Or you could move the document to the new process. Which means you can
>> stay in CR. Although you still need to get approval for the new version,
>> just as if you were going from LC to CR, given there are limited changes it
>> should be pretty straightforward.
> I believe we discussed this option at TPAC:
> http://www.w3.org/2014/10/30-html-wg-minutes.html#item13 (very end of
> this topic)  Paul proposed running a CfC to switch Canvas to new process.

The old process was not so bad as long the group kept on it.
How long will it take to do the CFC? Maybe it's more efficient to keep
things as-is

>> cheers
>> 22.10.2014, 04:07, "Rik Cabanier" <cabanier@gmail.com>:
>> > On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 9:20 AM, Richard Schwerdtfeger <
>> schwer@us.ibm.com> wrote:
>> >> Sam,
>> >>
>> >> At the last meeting we dicussed meeting times on Canvas at the face to
>> face. This is proving to be problematic:
>> >>
>> >> 1. SVG, HTML, and PF all meet on the same 2 days at the face to face
>> meeting
>> >> 2. I am a member of all 3 working groups
>> >> 3. PF has scheduled my time in group sessions with HTML, SVG, Digital
>> Publishing, and CSS as well as ARIA.next the last day.
>> >>
>> >> I don't have any control over the scheduling of TPAC but since we
>> never got around to scheduling exact times for things like Canvas until now
>> I don't see any bandwidth for participating in an canvas discussion now.
>> Mark will have time and will have changes to the canvas spec. based on
>> implementations and will be able to bring those changes to the working
>> group for Canvas 1.
>> >>
>> >> Mark has completed many of the test cases and testing on the test
>> cases I specified. I am working with him on areas where there is confusion.
>> Mark is now into the hit region testing and he is working on the scroll
>> testing. He has been filing bugs on the browser manufacturers. So, a lot of
>> progress has been made. I envision a quick jump back to last call and then
>> a rapid pass through CR assuming implementation testing continues to go the
>> way it has - very well.
>> >>
>> >> It would be nice if there was a way to expedite this round trip like
>> HTML has done. Is that possible?
>> > Hi Rich,
>> > are you envisioning substantive changes to the spec or is this just
>> about clarifying existing features? If it is the latter, we can stay in CR.
>> --
>> Charles McCathie Nevile - web standards - CTO Office, Yandex
>> chaals@yandex-team.ru - - - Find more at http://yandex.com
Received on Tuesday, 11 November 2014 17:49:12 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:05:42 UTC