Oh. It is just a position to discuss. If the task force agrees, then the task force can raise a bug or whatever. To be honest I don't want to waste a lot of time debating it. The content of the document is way more important to me than whether it is in more than one place. Also, I am sure the HTML working group has opinions on this. As the M12N activity moves ahead, I expect that all sorts of things are going to change. Anyway, don't panic Sam! On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 1:17 PM, Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net> wrote: > On 11/10/2014 01:45 PM, Shane McCarron wrote: > >> 3. Duplicated text shouldn't be in html specification - it will diverge >> with this note and there is always a risk that there will be >> conflicting advise. Moreover, the HTML spec already references this >> note. >> > > I was afraid this would happen. > > As an editor of the Text Alternatives document feel free to decide what > should be in the Text Alternatives Document. > > If you have feedback on what should be in the HTML specification, I > encourage you to post your suggestions on public-html. > > - Sam Ruby > > -- Shane McCarron Managing Director, Applied Testing and Technology, Inc.
Received on Monday, 10 November 2014 19:24:16 UTC