W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html-a11y@w3.org > January 2013

Re: HTML-A11y bugs (Media team)

From: Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2013 15:15:09 +1100
Message-ID: <CAHp8n2m9-vPWT-KwTY1p_iP3grMq_6o+2764wwBauYUek1ag+Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: tink@tink.co.uk
Cc: janina@rednote.net, john@foliot.ca, HTML Accessibility Task Force <public-html-a11y@w3.org>
Just saying that after two months of nobody having an issue with my
proposed resolutions it may be time to just go ahead with them.

Regards,
Silvia.

On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 1:02 AM, Léonie Watson <tink@tink.co.uk> wrote:

> “Can I point back at my email of 14th November last year where I proposed
> resolutions to many of these bugs:
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-a11y/2012Nov/0040.html”***
> *
>
> ** **
>
> Thanks Silvia. Your proposed resolutions were helpful and haven’t been
> forgotten. I believe the plan is for them to be discussed/agreed by the
> Media team, before they’re actioned.****
>
> ** **
>
> Léonie. ****
>
>  ****
>
> *From:* Silvia Pfeiffer [mailto:silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* 21 January 2013 12:50
> *To:* tink@tink.co.uk
> *Cc:* janina@rednote.net; john@foliot.ca; HTML Accessibility Task Force
> *Subject:* Re: HTML-A11y bugs (Media team)****
>
> ** **
>
> Can I point back at my email of 14th November last year where I proposed
> resolutions to many of these bugs:
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-a11y/2012Nov/0040.html
>
> Regards,
> Silvia.****
>
> On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 7:53 PM, Léonie Watson <tink@tink.co.uk> wrote:***
> *
>
> Janina & John,****
>
>  ****
>
> We’ve now been through all the bugs (against the 5.0 spec) tagged with the
> a11ytf keyword. These are the bugs marked resolved and either NeedsInfo or
> WontFix that are assigned to the Media team.****
>
>  ****
>
> http://tinyurl.com/bsjhpav****
>
>  ****
>
> We’re hoping to get this backlog cleared by the end of the month, leaving
> the way clear for the TF to focus on open bugs against the current specc.
> Essentially we need decisions as to whether these bugs should be reopened
> (and reassigned), moved to 5.1, or verified/closed.****
>
>  ****
>
> Léonie.****
>
>  ****
>
> ** **
>
Received on Tuesday, 22 January 2013 04:15:57 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:05:32 UTC