W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html-a11y@w3.org > September 2012

Re: Getting HTML5 to Recommendation in 2014

From: Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2012 10:04:02 +1000
Message-ID: <CAHp8n2=pQr=xAOLLx8jkK=iFVfF+MdCqQ5ki5zixtfP_H_8bsw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
Cc: Steve Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com>, "public-html@w3.org" <public-html@w3.org>, "w3c-wai-pf@w3.org" <w3c-wai-pf@w3.org>, "public-html-a11y@w3.org" <public-html-a11y@w3.org>
On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 12:40 AM, Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net> wrote:
> On 09/20/2012 07:35 AM, Steve Faulkner wrote:
>>
>> Hi Paul,
>>
>> I noted this;
>>
>> "Move responsibility for the HTML5: Techniques for providing useful
>> text alternatives document from the HTML WG to the A11y TF. "
>>
>> This is the first I have heard of this. What is the reasoning behind
>> the recommendation?
>
>
> One clear error[1] has already been identified in the document, perhaps this
> is a second one.  I'll share that the general thinking was along the lines
> of "move things that should be jointly produced between PF WG and the HTML
> WG to the joint task force".  But clearly as editor of that specification
> your input would have considerable weight, so as such I would like to hear
> what you would propose.

May I suggest that there is also an error on Issue-194?
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2012Sep/0266.html

I haven't received feedback on my questions yet, so not sure if that
was misclassified or the decision process indeed changed for that
issue.

Cheers,
Silvia.
Received on Friday, 21 September 2012 00:04:50 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 21 September 2012 00:04:51 GMT