On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 12:40 AM, Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net> wrote: > On 09/20/2012 07:35 AM, Steve Faulkner wrote: >> >> Hi Paul, >> >> I noted this; >> >> "Move responsibility for the HTML5: Techniques for providing useful >> text alternatives document from the HTML WG to the A11y TF. " >> >> This is the first I have heard of this. What is the reasoning behind >> the recommendation? > > > One clear error[1] has already been identified in the document, perhaps this > is a second one. I'll share that the general thinking was along the lines > of "move things that should be jointly produced between PF WG and the HTML > WG to the joint task force". But clearly as editor of that specification > your input would have considerable weight, so as such I would like to hear > what you would propose. May I suggest that there is also an error on Issue-194? http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2012Sep/0266.html I haven't received feedback on my questions yet, so not sure if that was misclassified or the decision process indeed changed for that issue. Cheers, Silvia.Received on Friday, 21 September 2012 00:04:50 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 21 September 2012 00:04:51 GMT