Silvia Pfeiffer wrote: > On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 7:40 PM, Joshue O Connor<joshue.oconnor@cfit.ie> wrote: >> Silvia Pfeiffer wrote: >>> Having had a look at this data makes me wonder ... since none of the >>> sites that you've crawled had used longdesc correctly, either your set >>> of sites is dubious or we are really staring at a totally mis-informed >>> Web developer community. >> >> Lol! I think its the later :-) > > I was actually hoping it is the earlier because then we could repeat > the experiment with some sites that actually provide a proper > @longdesc. If even us a11y people can only find such sites by > hand-picking them, there is indeed something seriously wrong. I see. In reality is probably a combination, but I would be cautious of calling the sample population 'wrong' as they probably do represent valid if poorly implemented use cases. I actually think no matter what the 'shiny thing' is that will eventually replace @longdesc - we shall be having this same conversion in ~ 10 years. JReceived on Wednesday, 19 September 2012 10:00:45 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 19 September 2012 10:00:45 GMT