Re: [HTMLWG] CfC: Adopt "Plan 2014" and make some specific related decisions

On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 8:02 AM, Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com> wrote:
>
> * Agree to rename the "HTML5 spec" component to "HTML spec", and only bring back specific bugs that address interoperability issues or can be addressed by a non-substantive change to the specification

What is the reasoning behind this change?
I don't think that this is actually helpful, because users have to
register a bug against either the spec that we are taking to REC or
HTML.next. Since the spec that we are taking to REC is HTML 5.0, I
would prefer we keep this component as "HTML5" - it is far less
confusing. Alternatively, "HTML5-CR" or "HTML5-LC" or "HTML5.0" would
make sense to me, too.

Regards,
Silvia.

Received on Monday, 8 October 2012 22:01:24 UTC