Re: Update to ARIA processing change proposal ISSUE-199

Edward O'Connor writes:
> >> There's no rationale provided for the changes proposed in the section titled "Clarify the existing ARIA section." As the change appears entirely editorial, I'd rather we leave it out of a consensus proposal.
> > Hmm... I agree this is editorial, but I do think it makes the section easier to process. If it's not blocking consensus (which I don't know that it is), I'd rather leave it in. I'm not sure how to express an explicit rationale, other than "people seemed to be misreading the relationship of the parts of the section and adding these headers help to distinguish them better".
> 
> OK.
> 
Thanks for the very prompt response on this remaining point, Ted.

Michael, I believe the next steps are yours now--to update the CP as
previously noted:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2012Jun/0160.html

Janina



> 
> Ted

-- 

Janina Sajka,	Phone:	+1.443.300.2200
			sip:janina@asterisk.rednote.net
		Email:	janina@rednote.net

The Linux Foundation
Chair, Open Accessibility:	http://a11y.org

The World Wide Web Consortium (W3C), Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI)
Chair,	Protocols & Formats	http://www.w3.org/wai/pf
	Indie UI			http://www.w3.org/WAI/IndieUI/

Received on Thursday, 28 June 2012 19:31:57 UTC