W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html-a11y@w3.org > January 2012

Re: ARIA lexical processing related bugs require escalation

From: Steve Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2012 13:48:39 +0000
Message-ID: <CA+ri+V=8GveN0GTw3zuVeHLiMvdOJo_KxS_0+-NHmkhkOurzUg@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Michael[tm] Smith" <mike@w3.org>
Cc: Michael Cooper <cooper@w3.org>, HTML Accessibility Task Force <public-html-a11y@w3.org>, Janina Sajka <janina@rednote.net>, Judy Brewer <jbrewer@w3.org>, Richard Schwerdtfeger <schwer@us.ibm.com>
Hi Mike,

keep you hat on, what I meant was that it is my understanding that
these bugs need to be dealt with and if they are not defined as issues
then they will not be considered for last call, if that is not the
case or they are not considered important enough to be sorted for
HTML5 then all well and good.


regards
stevef

On 13 January 2012 13:43, Michael[tm] Smith <mike@w3.org> wrote:
> And for the record I don't believe that any of them need to be "escalated".
>
> In the HTML WG "escalation" effectively means "I want the editor to stop
> working on this bug". It means you are pretty much giving up. It means you
> are implicitly claiming that is has reached a point of disagreement that is
> otherwise unresolvable. That is, you're saying that you and the editor
> disagree and there is no way that you are going to be get resolution
> without the chairs stepping in to adjudicate a decision.
>
> In my estimation none of these bugs have reached that point. They're not
> even close. In particular, in the case of bug 11893 it's not even close to
> being clear what Hixie is actually supposed to do in order to resolve that
> bug. Hixie asked 9 months ago, "What's the spec I should use as the
> reference for these rules?" and Rich responded, "We are drafting spec. text
> at the HTML Accessibility Face to Face in San Diego" and posted a follow-up
> comment 5 months ago that was helpful but in no way actionable by Hixie.
>
> So to take that bug at this point and "escalate" it makes zero sense to me.
> And pretty much the same for the rest of the bugs you listed also.
>
>  --Mike
>
> Steve Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com>, 2012-01-13 10:13 +0000:
>
>> I believe these bugs need to be escalated to issue(s) for last call as
>> they are taken from the requirements in WAI-ARIA Lexical Processing
>> http://www.w3.org/2011/01/aria-lexical-processing:
>>
>> add role attribute to list of global attributes and add definition for it
>> https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=11891
>>
>> explicitly state that ARIA states and properties are formal/normative
>> HTML attributes
>> https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=11892
>>
>> define lexical processing rules for ARIA attributes
>> https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=11893
>>
>
> --
> Michael[tm] Smith
> http://people.w3.org/mike/+



-- 
with regards

Steve Faulkner
Technical Director - TPG

www.paciellogroup.com | www.HTML5accessibility.com |
www.twitter.com/stevefaulkner
HTML5: Techniques for providing useful text alternatives -
dev.w3.org/html5/alt-techniques/
Web Accessibility Toolbar - www.paciellogroup.com/resources/wat-ie-about.html
Received on Friday, 13 January 2012 13:49:39 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 04:42:52 GMT