W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html-a11y@w3.org > January 2012

[Bug 13531] use of implicit labels in examples

From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
Date: Fri, 06 Jan 2012 10:36:26 +0000
To: public-html-a11y@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1Rj79u-0003Ee-7w@jessica.w3.org>

steve faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
                 CC|                            |faulkner.steve@gmail.com

--- Comment #7 from steve faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com> 2012-01-06 10:36:23 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> EDITOR'S RESPONSE: This is an Editor's Response to your comment. If you are
> satisfied with this response, please change the state of this bug to CLOSED. If
> you have additional information and would like the editor to reconsider, please
> reopen this bug. If you would like to escalate the issue to the full HTML
> Working Group, please add the TrackerRequest keyword to this bug, and suggest
> title and text for the tracker issue; or you may create a tracker issue
> yourself, if you are able to do so. For more details, see this document:
> <http://dev.w3.org/html5/decision-policy/decision-policy.html>.
> Status: Rejected
> Change Description: no spec change
> Rationale: Examples that do not work everywhere yet is not a reason to change
> the examples. It's an incentive to get the software fixed.

These examples are not for a new feature they are for a feature that has been
around for a long time (10+ years):


In this example, we implicitly associate two labels with two text input

<FORM action="..." method="post">
   First Name
   <INPUT type="text" name="firstname">
   <INPUT type="text" name="lastname">
   Last Name

Continuing to promote a method that does not work across browsers without at
least providing a warning does a disservice to users and developers. Why
promote coding practices that don't work cross browser?

Configure bugmail: https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Received on Friday, 6 January 2012 10:36:29 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:05:25 UTC