W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html-a11y@w3.org > February 2012

Re: Change Proposal for Issue 194

From: Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2012 11:34:59 +1100
Message-ID: <CAHp8n2nZ6OuFyYnp1+7d2+f8emMVoFaNyy9dL3MRy4KupbMyXw@mail.gmail.com>
To: David Singer <singer@apple.com>
Cc: Janina Sajka <janina@rednote.net>, Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis <bhawkeslewis@googlemail.com>, John Foliot <john@foliot.ca>, public-html@w3.org, public-html-a11y@w3.org
Well, this is why I wanted the attribute to be called @transcription
rather than @transcript, because it should contain everything a user
needs to read in order to get the same "experience" that a user gets
who watches the film. So to me transcript = captions + descriptions
(roughly).

Silvia.

On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 11:24 AM, David Singer <singer@apple.com> wrote:
> Does seem that a *description* of a video and a *transcript* are quite distinct.
>
> In this video, a transcript might end:
>
>
> heedi hoo! heedie hoo!
>
> Do-NUT!
>
> a description might be more…informative.
>
>
> David Singer
> Multimedia and Software Standards, Apple Inc.
>
>
Received on Wednesday, 15 February 2012 00:35:46 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 04:42:53 GMT