Re: libreoffice now implements HTML 5 canvas

Sam,

If you recall I submitted a separate change proposal for the text baseline
which caused the reopening of Issue 131. The original proposal had
deficiencies as outlined by the chairs. Paul is aware of this as I reminded
him in January.

My suggestion would be to do the following:

1. Keep Ian's drawfocusring methods. They are acceptable to the
accessibility task force and they separate out drawFocusRing into two
functions drawSystemFocusRing and drawCustomFocusRing eliminating the need
for canDrawCustom per below.
2. Include back Chapter 11 on Caret and Selection Management. This section
was approved by the chairs prior to the decision to vacate.
3. Review the new text baseline proposal to see if it sufficiently meets
your needs. The text baseline in textmetrics provides information to the
author to enable the author to compute a focus ring's or caret's bounds.

Cheers,
Rich


Rich Schwerdtfeger



From:	Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
To:	Richard Schwerdtfeger/Austin/IBM@IBMUS,
Cc:	Paul Cotton <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>,
            public-html-a11y@w3.org, public-canvas-api@w3.org, Frank
            Olivier <Frank.Olivier@microsoft.com>,
            cyns@exchange.microsoft.com, jbrewer@w3.org,
            david.bolter@gmail.com, chuck@jumis.com, Philippe Le Hegaret
            <plh@w3.org>, mike@w3.org
Date:	02/07/2012 04:05 PM
Subject:	Re: libreoffice now implements HTML 5 canvas



On 02/07/2012 04:47 PM, Richard Schwerdtfeger wrote:
> Paul, Sam,
>
> You should consider reverting your vacated decision on canvas
> caret/selection processing.
>
> libreoffice now provides a full office suite, including rich text
> editing using HTML 5 canvas:
>
> http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/design/msg03226.html

This is certainly relevant information.  Thanks for forwarding it.

[snip]

> At this point I see no reason to submit a new change proposal. You have
> the one we submitted previously.

The proposal submitted previously continues to not specify the baseline.
  Perhaps I missed it, but nothing in that email above specifically
supports the removal of the canDrawCustom parameter from drawFocusRing.

> Rich
>
> Rich Schwerdtfeger

- Sam Ruby

Received on Tuesday, 7 February 2012 23:38:38 UTC