W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html-a11y@w3.org > August 2012

Re: FORMAL OBJECTION (was RE: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-204 aria-hidden)

From: Janina Sajka <janina@rednote.net>
Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2012 17:55:36 -0400
To: Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis <bhawkeslewis@googlemail.com>
Cc: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>, John Foliot <john@foliot.ca>, Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>, public-html@w3.org, HTML Accessibility Task Force <public-html-a11y@w3.org>
Message-ID: <20120814215536.GA6999@concerto.rednote.net> 
Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis writes:
> On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 9:15 PM, Janina Sajka <janina@rednote.net> wrote:
> > And, am I correct that this is still vaporware?
> 
> I don't think the dismissive term "vaporware" is applicable to an
> implementation idea.


It is my understanding that the claim is not an idea, but an actual
implementation. I'm happy to withdraw the term "vaporware," if that's a
problem for anyone. The question here is where to get those
implementations so that we can actually test?

Janina
Received on Tuesday, 14 August 2012 21:56:10 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 14 August 2012 21:56:11 GMT