W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html-a11y@w3.org > August 2012

Re: Audience Based Validator User Interface (ISSUE-206)

From: Steve Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2012 09:44:49 +0100
Message-ID: <CA+ri+VmFbFJtGsBWdv5RR9HwBmDzGfUiAX-udsAQS2Z1eeKDdQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis <bhawkeslewis@googlemail.com>
Cc: Laura Carlson <laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com>, Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@gmail.com>, Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>, "public-html@w3.org WG" <public-html@w3.org>, HTML Accessibility Task Force <public-html-a11y@w3.org>, "Michael[tm] Smith" <mike@w3.org>
Hi Ben,
this would make more sense to me as it reflects reality,
but as one tool vendor has commented, this would appear to entail all HTML5
authoring tools including some form of built in conformance checking.


On 5 August 2012 20:25, Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis

> On Sun, Aug 5, 2012 at 7:28 PM, Steve Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > in any of the above a conforming HTML5 authoring tool would be useless
> if it
> > could not emit the documents.
> Maybe we should say that a conforming HTML5 authoring tool MAY emit
> "non-conforming HTML5 documents" but MUST make the author informed of
> the (machine-assessable) conformance status of the document when
> emitting.
> --
> Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis

with regards

Steve Faulkner
Technical Director - TPG

www.paciellogroup.com | www.HTML5accessibility.com |
HTML5: Techniques for providing useful text alternatives -
Web Accessibility Toolbar - www.paciellogroup.com/resources/wat-ie-about.html
Received on Monday, 6 August 2012 08:45:58 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:05:29 UTC