W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html-a11y@w3.org > April 2012

Re: Issue 204 proposal

From: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2012 17:43:10 -0400
Message-ID: <4F971E6E.9030903@intertwingly.net>
To: public-html-a11y@w3.org, Matthew Turvey <mcturvey@gmail.com>, Cynthia Shelly <cyns@microsoft.com>
On 04/23/2012 09:27 AM, Matthew Turvey wrote:
> On 20 April 2012 22:52, Cynthia Shelly<cyns@microsoft.com>  wrote:
>> Edward, Matt, Jonas,
>>
>> I’ve created a CP for issue 204 which I think includes the arguments from
>> both your CP and Laura Carlson’s.  We’ve been discussing this in the
>> accessibility TF for the last couple of days, and I’d very much like your
>> feedback.  My hope is that we can come to a single CP that address
>> everyone’s concerns, and that you can withdraw yours.
>>
>> Here is my CP:
>>
>> http://www.w3.org/html/wg/wiki/Correct_Hidden_Attribute_Section_v2
>
> Wouldn't it be easier to just go straight to a Call For Consensus on Jonas' CP?
>
> http://www.w3.org/html/wg/wiki/ChangeProposals/AllowAriaReferHidden

A more general form of that question, addressed to everybody in general, 
and Cynthia and Matthew in particular.

If, at the end of the day, we have two proposals left, and we were to go 
to survey on those two remaining proposals, would you be intending to 
state an objection to one of those proposals in the survey?

If we end up with a proposal that nobody is willing to object to, then 
we can skip the survey step.

> -Matt

- Sam Ruby
Received on Tuesday, 24 April 2012 21:43:41 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 04:42:58 GMT