- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2011 20:48:50 +0000
- To: public-html-a11y@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=13174 --- Comment #9 from Marat Tanalin | tanalin.com <mtanalin@yandex.ru> 2011-09-30 20:48:49 UTC --- (In reply to comment #8) > I guess I'll change the content model back to allowing flow content Unbelievable. ;-) > but add an example or note explaining why putting > headings in <th>s is a bad idea. Yes, it's good idea to give recommendations here instead of requiring smth. It makes sense to adopt this practice more widely in the HTML spec. > Maybe we should just allow flow but blacklist certain descendants, say > sectioning content, sectioning roots, and heading content? Maybe. But, quoting yourself, wouldn't it be confusing for authors who do not read specs (as well as do not care about validation) at all? Anyway, it may make sense to just rollback rules for TH to HTML4 state, and, instead of inventing some blacklists, work harder on more important things like providing consistency between good-practice server-side validation and client-side one (bug 13769). Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
Received on Friday, 30 September 2011 20:48:55 UTC