W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html-a11y@w3.org > September 2011

[Bug 13435] Editorial changes to The Video element (3 of 5)

From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
Date: Tue, 06 Sep 2011 19:29:24 +0000
To: public-html-a11y@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1R11Km-0003Ni-BU@jessica.w3.org>

John Foliot <jfoliot@stanford.edu> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
             Status|RESOLVED                    |REOPENED
         Resolution|WORKSFORME                  |

--- Comment #7 from John Foliot <jfoliot@stanford.edu> 2011-09-06 19:29:23 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> Status: Accepted
> Change Description: no spec change
> Rationale: 
> When the video is paused, the current captions do keep showing. What makes you
> think otherwise?

What makes you assume that this will be the default behavior? This is not yet
specified, and I wonder aloud why being more specific in a specification is a
bad thing? 

Is there a technical reason for not adding the additional sentence: "If
synchronized text (e.g., captions or subtitles) or sign-language
tracks are present, those tracks must be represented in the paused frame as

Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 6 September 2011 19:29:30 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:05:23 UTC