W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html-a11y@w3.org > January 2011

Minutes: 11 January HTML Accessibility Bug-Triage

From: Martin Kliehm <w3c@kliehm.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2011 19:34:50 +0100
Message-ID: <4D2CA2CA.6010000@kliehm.com>
To: HTML Accessibility Task Force <public-html-a11y@w3.org>
Here are some short minutes of today's bug-triage meeting. We discussed 
a couple of bugs where we needed a group consensus, otherwise group 
members added comments to a number of other bugs where it was clear 
whether to apply the a11yTF keyword or not. Laura's list of bugs 
awaiting the TF decision should be down to a single-digit number by now.


Minutes: http://www.w3.org/2011/01/11-a11y-bugs-minutes.html

Next meeting: 18 January


HTML Accessibility Bug-Triage
11 Jan 2011


     kliehm, Marco_Ranon, Joshue
     Laura_Carlson, Michael_Cooper

1. Triage of Laura's list of bugs awaiting the a11yTF keyword decision

TOPIC: Triage of Laura's list of bugs awaiting the a11yTF keyword decision

<Marco_Ranon> http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=10494

Status is resolved fixed, Marco will verify it so that Steve Faulkner 
can close the bug.

<Joshue> It looks like the ARIA stuff didn't work due to a typo..

Adding the ARIA keyword and assigning to Steve, also a11yTF because the 
sub-triage sub-team sees this related to ISSUE-129 and therefore it 
would be TF priority.

s/Adding the ARIA/http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=10484 
Adding the ARIA keyword/

<Joshue> Is there some low hanging fruit in terms of getting bugs to LC?

<Marco_Ranon> http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=10483

The bug-triage sub-team doesn't think this bug is TF priority.


<Joshue> I will look at 
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=10916 and comment. Send 
comments to the round robin.


no a11yTF keyword


adding a11yTF keyword

<Joshue> Bug 11593 is important should be dealt with by the Media Sub 
Team, as it certainly has accessibility ramifications.

Marco and Martin will add comments on bugs where it is clear that they 
are either TF priority or not.
Received on Tuesday, 11 January 2011 18:35:23 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:05:17 UTC