On 02/23/2011 02:09 PM, Laura Carlson wrote: > Hi Sam, > >> The chairs have discussed this and the only delay is that there is no >> clear identification of what is the new information[1] in this request. > > I added a "New Information" section. Is that what you mean? You certainly are thorough, not to mention quick. Kudos. I haven't reviewed all of this section, but I will say that the following subsection is in the spirit of what we are looking for: http://www.w3.org/html/wg/wiki/ChangeProposals/InstateLongdesc#New_Formal_Use_Cases_Requiring_longdesc > Best Regards, > Laura - Sam Ruby > On 2/23/11, Sam Ruby<rubys@intertwingly.net> wrote: >> On 02/21/2011 07:43 PM, Laura Carlson wrote: >>> Dear Chairs, >>> >>> Please consider re-opening ISSUE 30. New information has been gathered >>> and a change proposal has been developed. >>> http://www.w3.org/html/wg/wiki/ChangeProposals/InstateLongdesc >> >> The chairs have discussed this and the only delay is that there is no >> clear identification of what is the new information[1] in this request. >> If you or others could provide this, that would speed up the process; >> otherwise the chairs will get to it in due course. >> >> Concurrently, we are working on Bug 11447[2] in order to clarify this >> requirement. >> >>> Thank you. >>> >>> Best Regards, >>> >>> Laura Carlson<laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com> >>> Gregory J. Rosmaita<oedipus@hicom.net> >>> John Foliot<jfoliot@stanford.edu> >> >> - Sam Ruby >> >> [1] http://www.w3.org/2005/10/Process-20051014/policies.html#WGChairReopen >> [2] http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=11447 >> >> > >Received on Wednesday, 23 February 2011 19:26:32 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 04:42:31 GMT