- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2011 21:45:01 +0000
- To: public-html-a11y@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=13657
Cynthia Shelly <cyns@microsoft.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED
Resolution|NEEDSINFO |
--- Comment #3 from Cynthia Shelly <cyns@microsoft.com> 2011-12-16 21:45:00 UTC ---
So, I think that just removing the clause "but with the caveat that the exact
value is not important" would make it less confusing.
consider the scenario where I have a slider with 50 at one end and 100 at the
other, and 4 tick marks in between, and step of 10. In that case, the range
does represent a set of specific numbers. This is a pretty common design
pattern for sliders on desktop apps. The sentence above makes it sound like
Range is not the right control for this. If range is not the right control for
this, what is?
--
Configure bugmail: https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Received on Friday, 16 December 2011 21:45:02 UTC