W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html-a11y@w3.org > April 2011

Re: Feedback on MediaController

From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2011 23:06:03 +0000 (UTC)
To: Eric Carlson <eric.carlson@apple.com>
cc: "public-html-a11y@w3.org Task Force" <public-html-a11y@w3.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.1104252305020.25791@ps20323.dreamhostps.com>
On Mon, 25 Apr 2011, Eric Carlson wrote:
> On Apr 25, 2011, at 3:25 PM, Ian Hickson wrote:
> >>>
> >>> As currently specified, grouped tracks always autoplay any tracks 
> >>> that are labeled autoplay, and those that are not simply don't play 
> >>> (while the controller's position advances regardless).
> >> 
> >>  I think it will be confusing for developers that some tracks in a 
> >> group can play while others do not. It seems more logical to me that 
> >> the playback state of all elements in a group should be kept in sync.
> > 
> > I've fixed the playing-when-nothing-is-playing problem, but I strongly 
> > disagree that we should always have all the tracks enabled at once. It 
> > would be a pain to unhook a media element to stop a track from playing 
> > instead of just pausing it.
> I definitely didn't mean that we should require all tracks to be enabled 
> at once, only that all enabled tracks in a group should play at the same 
> time.

That's what I'm disagreeing with.

Say you have four <audio> elements, one for each dub, and a <video> 
element. All five come from different media resources.

I think you should be able to have them all in the group, but only have 
one <audio> playing at a time, ever though in each <audio> there is only 
one audio track and it is enabled.

Ian Hickson               U+1047E                )\._.,--....,'``.    fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/       U+263A                /,   _.. \   _\  ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer.   `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Monday, 25 April 2011 23:06:26 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:05:19 UTC