- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2010 18:58:57 +0000
- To: public-html-a11y@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=10853
--- Comment #2 from Shelley Powers <shelleyp@burningbird.net> 2010-09-30 18:58:57 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> Why is the <p> element not sufficient?
>
> Do you have a concrete page we could use to discuss this showing the problem in
> question? (It can be an artificially simple page that just has the relevant
> content, if you like.)
I am sure that Gregory will also respond, but to me the relevant section in his
bug report is the following:
" 2. A method to reference a longer description of an image, without
including the content in the main flow of a page.
I'm assuming the text about being able to provide this in such a way that it's
not visible to sighted users is also relevant.
We did not deprecate longdesc, which has a two part aspect to it: discourage
use AND provide an equivalent or superior approved technique. All we did is
make it obsolete, leaving the functionality it provided unfulfilled.
However, I think this is a duplicate of another bug? One that Laura filed? The
following?
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=10455
It got assigned to Paul Cotton, so not sure what's going on.
--
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Received on Thursday, 30 September 2010 18:58:59 UTC