- From: Leif Halvard Silli <xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no>
- Date: Mon, 7 Jun 2010 18:43:20 +0200
- To: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
- Cc: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>, Leif Halvard Silli <xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no>, John Foliot <jfoliot@stanford.edu>, Laura Carlson <laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com>, Shelley Powers <shelleyp@burningbird.net>, HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>, HTML Accessibility Task Force <public-html-a11y@w3.org>
Sam Ruby, Mon, 07 Jun 2010 12:38:59 -0400: > On 06/07/2010 12:16 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote: >> On Sat, Jun 5, 2010 at 3:59 AM, Leif Halvard Silli wrote: >>> The need to continue to discus<figure>,<details> etc was not >>> expressed in the counter-proposal. If it had been expressed there, then >>> not only would it have lowered the ad-hominen smack of the whole >>> counter-proposal effort, it could also have lead to more support for it. >> >> I wasn't aware that there was any particular need to assert that this >> portion of the spec would continue to be edited like every other >> portion of the spec. It seems redundant to add that into every Change >> Proposal written from now on, but I can make sure that it is a part of >> any proposals I author from now on if necessary. > > Not necessary. I'm going to assume that this was a comment to Tab. >> ~TJ > > - Sam Ruby -- leif halvard silli
Received on Monday, 7 June 2010 16:43:58 UTC