RE: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-91: Removing the aside Element

Apologies, as the very long URLS in my previous note appear to have been 
joined. The 2 URLs should have been:

http://www.w3.org/html/wg/wiki/ChangeProposals/KeepNewElements#The_use_of_semantically_rich_elements_is_an_expressed_desire_of_the_W3C_Accessibility_.28WAI.29_community



http://www.w3.org/html/wg/wiki/ChangeProposals/KeepNewElements#The_HTML_WG.27s_Accessibility_Task_Force_opposes_the_removal_of_these_elements.2C_attributes.2C_and_controls


JF

Received on Friday, 4 June 2010 19:47:35 UTC