- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2010 22:51:46 +0000 (UTC)
- To: Laura Carlson <laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com>
- Cc: Janina Sajka <janina@rednote.net>, "Michael(tm) Smith" <mike@w3.org>, HTML Accessibility Task Force <public-html-a11y@w3.org>
On Fri, 29 Jan 2010, Laura Carlson wrote: > > > Since none of those have been rejected, why are we looking at change > > proposals already? > > Because the HTML WG Chairs have asked for change proposals for Issue 31. > HTML Tracker Issue 31 was opened before the HTML WG Decision Policy was > put in place. > > The Full History of Issue 31: > http://esw.w3.org/topic/HTML/IssueAltAttribute > > Accessibility Change Proposal Status: > http://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/HTML/wiki/Accessibility_Change_Proposal_Status > > Some change proposals in the table don't have bugs because they too > predate the Decision Policy. Ah, ok. It seems unfortunate to go through the whole time-consuming process for things that are uncontroversial -- I recommend filing bugs for the proposals first, especially for the editorial stuff, since I see no problem with just doing those. That would save us (the task force) a lot of time. -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Friday, 29 January 2010 22:52:17 UTC