W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html-a11y@w3.org > December 2010

Minutes: December 14: HTML Accessibility Bug Triage Sub-Team

From: Martin Kliehm <w3c@kliehm.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2010 18:48:55 +0100
Message-ID: <4D07AE07.90103@kliehm.com>
To: HTML Accessibility Task Force <public-html-a11y@w3.org>
Minutes: http://www.w3.org/2010/12/14-a11y-bugs-minutes.html
Agenda: 
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-a11y/2010Dec/0153.html

====

- DRAFT -

HTML Accessibility Bug-Triage
14 Dec 2010

Attendees

Present
     Martin_Kliehm, Michael_Cooper
Regrets
     Laura_Carlson, Marco_Ranon, Joshue_O_Connor
Chair
     Martin_Kliehm
Scribe
     Michael_Cooper

Contents

* Topics
   1. Triage of Laura's list of bugs awaiting the a11yTF keyword decision
   2. Assign homework for next week


TOPIC: Triage of Laura's list of bugs awaiting the a11yTF keyword decision

<kliehm> http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=10464

No need for TF to review, just a matter if getting around to implement 
the requested change

http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=10467

Ask ARIA team to review, but not a TF priority

http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=10424

http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=10438

http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=10440

http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=10441

http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=10447

http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=10479

Ask ARIA mapping team to review and update as the mappings are prepared, 
but no need for entire TF to review

http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=10439

Ask ARIA mapping team to review. Note bug triage sub-team thinks it's 
possible the "fix" is actually a negative accessibility benefit, but not 
sure. ARIA mapping team should escalate if needed.

http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=10444

http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=10448

http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=10449

http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=10450

http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=10451

http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=10462

http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=10478

These are part of HTML-ISSUE-129. There is some debate on them taking 
place actively. Therefore these should be a TF priority.

http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=10445

http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=10446

These bugs are under active discussion, therefore these should be a TF 
priority. Also for 10446, add the media keyword.

So the media sub-team can weigh in on if roles of media elements affect 
processing of media.

http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=10434

<kliehm> scribe: Michael_Cooper

<kliehm> scribenick: MichaelC

Make a TF priority because of relationship to longdesc. Note catch 22 
between relying on browser support before spec solution, and browsers 
waiting on spec. Not sure this is a longdesc solution, but needs to be 
considered and supported / opposed in context of overall longdesc strategy.

http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=10463

Relates to http://dev.w3.org/html5/html-api-map/overview.html

(note this supplants an earlier draft Steve referenced)

Not a TF priority

integration of the HTML to AAPI mapping is important

but don't need TF review of the specific mechanism via a bug

assign bug to Steve

he can close or escalate

<kliehm> http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=10713

<kliehm> Already has a11yTF keyword

<kliehm> http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=10693

<kliehm> dito

<kliehm> http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=10657

<kliehm> Ask ARIA mapping team to review and update as the mappings are 
prepared, but no need for entire TF to review

<kliehm> http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=10645

<kliehm> The related ISSUE-133 has been closed without prejudice because 
no change proposals have been submitted, so this has not gained enough 
interest to be task force priority.

<kliehm> http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=10642 already has 
a11yTF keyword

<kliehm> http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=10618

<kliehm> Related to ISSUE-129, ask ARIA mapping team to review and 
update as the mappings are prepared, but no need for entire TF to review.

<kliehm> http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=10605

<kliehm> Verified fixed

(no longer needs to be in candidate list)

http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=9428

Not a TF priority

http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=10603

Not a TF priority, but do want ARIA mapping team to review. Has been 
associated with HTML-ISSUE-129.

http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=10497

add aria keyword

but not a TF priority

don't think there will be support for doing anything on this, so 
recommend closing

http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=10496

Not a TF priority, and appears to be fixed

Steve should mark as verified if he agrees, or push back if needed


TOPIC: Assign homework for next week

<kliehm> Michael reviews bugs 11395, 11391, 10963, 10900, 10927, 10921, 
10918, 10917, 10916

<kliehm> Martin reviews 10915, 10839, 10781, 10780, 10779, 10778, 10775, 
10773, 10419

<kliehm> Marco continues with his bugs.
Received on Tuesday, 14 December 2010 17:49:24 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 04:42:27 GMT