Edward O'Connor writes: > > Minor point of clarification; at present this: > > > >> The Task Force supports the counter-proposal found at > >> http://www.w3.org/html/wg/wiki/User:Eoconnor/keephidden. > > > > Is a draft proposal, which has not yet been forwarded to the WG. > > Indeed. > > > I am unsure of the proposed timeline for that, but suspect that it is > > sooner rather than later. > > I believe we have until early May to deliver the counter-proposal to > the WG. Several others, for instance Jeremy Keith, have expressed > interest in contributing to the proposal; I'd like to give them the > opportunity to improve it before we submit it. If anyone in the a11y > TF would like to pitch in, that would be great! > There is strong sentiment among quite a few TF members to take a position on these issues. However, we also have a lot on our plates, so are generally unwilling to put a lot of time into these particular issues. Perhaps we could return to Plan A -- our candidate resolution opposing -- which you could then cite? I believe we're in sync on the meaning between our candidate resolution and this counter-proposal, but reluctant to get bogged down over this. Janina > > Ted -- Janina Sajka, Phone: +1.443.300.2200 sip:janina@asterisk.rednote.net Chair, Open Accessibility janina@a11y.org Linux Foundation http://a11y.org Chair, Protocols & Formats Web Accessibility Initiative http://www.w3.org/wai/pf World Wide Web Consortium (W3C)Received on Tuesday, 13 April 2010 19:27:42 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 04:42:07 GMT