Re: Weekly Resolved & Rejected Bugs Report

Hi Laura,

On Sun, Apr 11, 2010 at 7:42 PM, Laura Carlson
<laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> 1. NEW BUGS:
>
<..>
> Bug 9452: "Handling of additional tracks of a multitrack audio/video
> resource" reported by Silvia Pfeiffer.
> http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=9452
> My View: I recommend that we expedite defining "a11ytf" keyword
> criteria so Silvia knows if the task force can officially work on this
> item or if she has to go it alone. Currently not having the "a11ytf"
> keyword designation blocks the task force from officially working on
> bugs key to the task force mission.

Not sure what that means, but if I'm sorry if I added the "a11ytf"
keyword by mistake. I thought it was one of my actions coming out of
the F2F meeting.


<..>
> 3. ESTABLISHING "A11yTF" KEYWORD CRITERIA:
>
<..>
> We currently have five bugs that I am aware of that have had the
> Keyword "a11ytf" applied with no approval from the task force:
> http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=7056
> http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=8674
> http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=8715
> http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=8827
> http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=9452

That last one is also one that I registered. It is in the same class,
basically, as Bug 9452, and was also discussed at the F2F, so I am
unsure why it ended up in a different categorisation to the other Bug.
Sorry again, if I shouldn't have applied the "a11ytf" keyword.


Cheers,
Silvia.

Received on Sunday, 11 April 2010 12:37:55 UTC