W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html-a11y@w3.org > December 2009

(unknown charset) Re: FW: CHANGE PROPOSAL: Table Summary

From: (unknown charset) Leif Halvard Silli <xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no>
Date: Sat, 12 Dec 2009 16:49:29 +0100
To: (unknown charset) Joshue O Connor <joshue.oconnor@cfit.ie>
Cc: (unknown charset) Leif Halvard Silli <xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no>, Laura Carlson <laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com>, Cynthia Shelly <cyns@microsoft.com>, HTML Accessibility Task Force <public-html-a11y@w3.org>
Message-ID: <20091212164929483986.0069b870@xn--mlform-iua.no>
Joshue O Connor, Sat, 12 Dec 2009 10:28:03 +0000:
> Leif Halvard Silli wrote:

> That may be the case. However, at this stage I don't want to conflate
> the issues  at all - as I don't think this issue of @sort, or
> @orientation is helping.

The ideas about @orientation, @sort, @definesorder etc in relationship 
to @summary takes the approach that @summary should be used for 
everything that cannot be programmatically defined, and that we should 
try to focus - or exclude - what @summary should be used for as much as 

This is not conflation, to me. Even if it may require two change 
proposals, it still belongs in the same debate.
leif halvard silli
Received on Saturday, 12 December 2009 15:50:10 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:05:07 UTC