W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-grddl-wg@w3.org > September 2008

RE: GRDDL WG may close any time now

From: Ogbuji, Chimezie <OGBUJIC@ccf.org>
Date: Sun, 7 Sep 2008 22:34:47 -0400
Message-ID: <2702D0EBA4F0A749968E52E8644184EA288986@CCHSCLEXMB59.cc.ad.cchs.net>
To: "Harry Halpin" <hhalpin@ibiblio.org>, "Dan Connolly" <connolly@w3.org>
cc: public-grddl-wg <public-grddl-wg@w3.org>, swick <swick@w3.org>, "Ian B. Jacobs" <ij@w3.org>
+1 for option 2):

2) Wait for a new Semantic Web Deployment Group at some point that updates 
RDFa, GRDDL, etc. to work with HTML5 WG.

Me personally, if GRDDL works for XHTML 1.x but is broken for HTML 5: it is not a catastrophe.  The differences (specific to this incompatibility) seem more motivated by dogma than legitimate technological justification.  My $0.02

Chimezie (chee-meh) Ogbuji
EECS / Medical Informatics Ph.D. Student (CWRU)
Clinical Investigations
Heart and Vascular Institute
Cleveland Clinic Foundation
9500 Euclid Avenue/ W26
Cleveland, Ohio 44195
Office: (216)444-8593
ogbujic@ccf.org



-----Original Message-----
From: public-grddl-wg-request@w3.org on behalf of Harry Halpin
Sent: Sat 9/6/2008 12:52 PM
To: Dan Connolly
Cc: public-grddl-wg; swick; Ian B. Jacobs
Subject: Re: GRDDL WG may close any time now
 

On Fri, 5 Sep 2008, Dan Connolly wrote:

>
> This GRDDL WG finished its job a while ago, but to
> stay on the safe side of some open patent policy issues*, W3C
> didn't formally close this WG.
>
> It has since become more clear that the issue doesn't
> affect the GRDDL WG, so this WG can be closed any time now.
>
> Does it matter to anybody when we close this WG?
>
> Do you have an upcoming birthday or anything, Harry? ;-)

Eventually, yes :)

> If we close this WG, the comments list stays open,
> but there's no way to come up with an answer that's
> officially on behalf of the WG.
>
> If we don't close the WG, I suppose Harry can
> call a meeting any time, given a week's notice,
> and we could conduct WG business; e.g. collective
> action re HTML 5 head/@profile.


This is the only issue that I can think of that might motivate keeping the 
group open. However, it is a fairly important issue that *should* be 
addressed whenever the rel/head/profile issue seems resolved by the HTML 5 
WG. DanC - would it be correct to say that, despite the various comments 
on the GRDDL list, that profile is defintely going to be dropped?

If so, we have 2 options to fix the problem, I think:

1) Reconvene a few meetings in order to issue perhaps a WG note and some 
test-case errata to deal with HTML 5?

2) Wait for a new Semantic Web Deployment Group at some point that updates 
RDFa, GRDDL, etc. to work with HTML5 WG.

What do GRDDL WG members think?


> That might re-raise the question of availability
> of W3C staff resources for the WG, too.
>
> I've given it a little thought and I suppose I'm content
> to close the WG and leave GRDDL's fate in the
> hands of the community as a whole, as I said in...
>
> The details of data in documents; GRDDL, profiles, and HTML5
> 2008-08-22
> http://www.w3.org/QA/2008/08/the_details_of_data_in_documen.html
> http://dig.csail.mit.edu/breadcrumbs/node/240
>
>
> * http://www.w3.org/2003/12/22-pp-faq.html#superset
>
>

-- 
 				--harry

 	Harry Halpin
 	Informatics, University of Edinburgh
         http://www.ibiblio.org/hhalpin





P Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail

Cleveland Clinic is ranked one of the top hospitals
in America by U.S. News & World Report (2008).  
Visit us online at http://www.clevelandclinic.org for
a complete listing of our services, staff and
locations.


Confidentiality Note:  This message is intended for use
only by the individual or entity to which it is addressed
and may contain information that is privileged,
confidential, and exempt from disclosure under applicable
law.  If the reader of this message is not the intended
recipient or the employee or agent responsible for
delivering the message to the intended recipient, you are
hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or
copying of this communication is strictly prohibited.  If
you have received this communication in error,  please
contact the sender immediately and destroy the material in
its entirety, whether electronic or hard copy.  Thank you.
Received on Monday, 8 September 2008 02:35:07 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 8 September 2008 02:35:07 GMT