- From: Murray Maloney <murray@muzmo.com>
- Date: Wed, 21 May 2008 09:31:56 -0400
- To: Alan Ruttenberg <alanruttenberg@gmail.com>
- Cc: Murray Maloney <murray@muzmo.com>,Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hpl.hp.com>, Harry Halpin <hhalpin@ibiblio.org>,Bijan Parsia <bparsia@cs.man.ac.uk>, public-grddl-comments@w3.org,public-grddl-wg@w3.org
At 09:14 AM 5/21/2008 -0400, Alan Ruttenberg wrote: >Hello Murray, > >Thanks for your comments. However, note that the specification has not >been designed to perform the function. It has been designed to explain >to someone how to perform the function. In the same way that an XSL transformation explains to an XSLT processor how to perform the function, right? I understand that there is software extant that performs the function described by the specification. Please correct me if I am wrong, but an XSL transform which performed that function according to the OWL-->RDF mapping spec would become a de-facto OWL-->RDF mapper. If that is correct, then a reference to OWL-->RDF might just as easily invoke an XSL transform as one that was written in Java or C++ or Python. There is no requirement in the GRDDL spec to refer to an XSL transform.
Received on Wednesday, 21 May 2008 13:30:53 UTC