Dan Connolly wrote: > On Fri, 2008-05-16 at 18:37 +0000, Booth, David (HP Software - Boston) > wrote: > [...] >> But unless someone else speaks up in support of this rewording *and* Jeremy agrees to it, I suggest dropping that paragraph. > > > This talk of synthesizing a position on behalf of the GRDDL WG doesn't > make much sense, to me. > > Participants in the GRDDL WG were more or less excused; they aren't > obliged to track this discussion any more. So it makes no sense > to speak on their behalf. > > It's all well and good for individuals to (a) give their own > opinions and (b) help Bijan and the OWL 2 WG > find relevant parts of the spec and perhaps the decision record, > but I don't think we have any decision-making authority any more. > That is correct and, the way I understood, Bijan commented as an individual, ie, the GRDDL WG was not asked by the OWL WG for an 'official' advice. Having said that, I found the summary of Harry very useful and, I would hope, it would also be useful for other members of the OWL WG, too... Ivan -- Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ PGP Key: http://www.ivan-herman.net/pgpkey.html FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Saturday, 17 May 2008 11:10:38 GMT