Re: GRDDL and OWL/XML

Bijan Parsia wrote:

>>> People are reading the SHOULD as a MUST.
>>
>> Really? I am not.
> 

To try to echo your argument about SHOULD

SHOULD means that we MUST have to have a good motivations for not doing 
so and MUST understand the ramifications of the decision.

The good motivation is:
- to not confuse OWL/XML document authors and/or implementors as to what 
is the normative definition of the language

Ramifications are:
- OWL/XML will not be automatically readable by XSLT aware GRDDL agents, 
but they will need to have special support.


And in your judgement the 'good motivation' outweighs the 'ramification'.

Have I expressed it about right?

[I am not about to have a got at you over this, it's not a trick 
question :)]

Jeremy