- From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Tue, 13 May 2008 17:08:05 +0100
- To: Bijan Parsia <bparsia@cs.man.ac.uk>
- CC: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>, public-grddl-comments@w3.org, public-grddl-wg@w3.org
Bijan Parsia wrote: >>> People are reading the SHOULD as a MUST. >> >> Really? I am not. > To try to echo your argument about SHOULD SHOULD means that we MUST have to have a good motivations for not doing so and MUST understand the ramifications of the decision. The good motivation is: - to not confuse OWL/XML document authors and/or implementors as to what is the normative definition of the language Ramifications are: - OWL/XML will not be automatically readable by XSLT aware GRDDL agents, but they will need to have special support. And in your judgement the 'good motivation' outweighs the 'ramification'. Have I expressed it about right? [I am not about to have a got at you over this, it's not a trick question :)] Jeremy
Received on Tuesday, 13 May 2008 16:09:43 UTC