W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-grddl-wg@w3.org > September 2007

Re: loopx test failure

From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hpl.hp.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2007 16:34:49 +0100
Message-ID: <46F29319.5070209@hpl.hp.com>
To: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
CC: public-grddl-wg@w3.org

Dan Connolly wrote:

> Hmm... I guess that's OK by me.
> 
> I wonder if renaming loopx.xsl is more or less costly.
> 
>
It's referenced by loopx.xml, which is presumably copied in a number of 
places. The redirect is probably the cheaper option

Jeremy
Received on Thursday, 20 September 2007 15:35:15 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:11:50 GMT