W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-grddl-wg@w3.org > September 2007

Re: loopx test failure

From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2007 16:07:07 +0100
Message-ID: <46F28C9B.3060306@w3.org>
To: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hpl.hp.com>
Cc: public-grddl-wg@w3.org

Jeremy Carroll wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> I am currently getting a failure on the loopx test, which the same code 
> used to pass.
> 
> My analysis is as follows:
> 
> Source URL:
> 
> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/grddl-wg/td/loopx
> 
> may map to
> 
> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/grddl-wg/td/loopx.xml
> 
> or to
> 
> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/grddl-wg/td/loopx.xsl

eek; indeed, it's unfortunate that the loopx.xsl
was given the same basename.

> both being of mimetype application/xml there is no valid content 
> negotiation to choose the former.
> 
> The test works if the former is chosen.
> 
> If the latter is chosen the test fails.
> 
> Even fi the former is chosen, there is potentially one or more 
> dereference of the same URL when using the GRDDL algorithm, which may 
> give the other result.
> 
> I suggest modifying the htaccess file to force
> 
> 
> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/grddl-wg/td/loopx
> 
> to map to
> 
> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/grddl-wg/td/loopx.xml

Hmm... I guess that's OK by me.

I wonder if renaming loopx.xsl is more or less costly.

> I would value anyone else experience of trying to run the loopx test
> 
> Jeremy


-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Thursday, 20 September 2007 15:06:48 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:11:50 GMT