W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-grddl-wg@w3.org > September 2007

Re: unaddressed comment?

From: Harry Halpin <hhalpin@ibiblio.org>
Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2007 09:52:55 -0400
Message-ID: <46F27B37.8020401@ibiblio.org>
To: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hpl.hp.com>, public-grddl-wg <public-grddl-wg@w3.org>

No problem.

Jeremy Carroll wrote:
>
> Dan Connolly wrote:
>> Jeremy Carroll wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> I don't see a reply to:
>>>
>>> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-grddl-comments/2007JulSep/0000.html
>>
>>
>>
>> It's a comment on the primer, so it wasn't critical path to REC,
>> but yes, it's still outstanding.
>>
>
> Hmmm, I've just looked at every instance of the word HTML or html in
> the primer. I don't think there is much room for real confusion.
>
> All the early uses are followed by examples that have a declaration of
> being XHTML. The later examples all have an xmlns decl for xhtml.
>
> I would encourage an editor to reply to the commentator asking for
> where this potential confusion actually arises.
>
> Jeremy
>
>
>


-- 
		-harry

Harry Halpin,  University of Edinburgh 
http://www.ibiblio.org/hhalpin 6B522426
Received on Thursday, 20 September 2007 13:53:15 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:11:50 GMT